Opinion
No. ED 108872
02-09-2021
Cornelius Danny RODGERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Cornelius Danny Rodgers, pro se. For Respondent: Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Cornelius Danny Rodgers, pro se.
For Respondent: Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Before Angela T. Quigless, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J., and James M. Dowd, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Cornelius Danny Rodgers ("Rodgers") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his motion to reopen proceedings under Rule 29.15 after the motion court had previously denied his amended motion filed by appointed counsel. In his sole point on appeal, Rodgers alleges the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion to reopen post-conviction proceedings without conducting a sufficient independent inquiry into his claim of abandonment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).