From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. R Yniguez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 10, 2024
24-cv-01171-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-01171-VC

06-10-2024

KYLE BENJAMIN RODGERS, Plaintiff, v. R YNIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

VINCE CHHABRIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Kyle Rodgers, a former detainee at Santa Cruz County Jail proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court reviewed the complaint and found that Rodgers failed to present allegations that the conditions in Administrative Segregation amounted to punishment, he failed to describe how his rights were violated in the disciplinary hearing and he failed to describe the actions of any specific defendants. The court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend for Rodgers to file an amended complaint curing the noted deficiencies.

The time to amend has passed and Rodgers has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, this complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

The clerk shall issue a separate judgment and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rodgers v. R Yniguez

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 10, 2024
24-cv-01171-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2024)
Case details for

Rodgers v. R Yniguez

Case Details

Full title:KYLE BENJAMIN RODGERS, Plaintiff, v. R YNIGUEZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 10, 2024

Citations

24-cv-01171-VC (N.D. Cal. Jun. 10, 2024)