From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Fife

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Apr 19, 2016
500 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. ED 103563

04-19-2016

Reginald Rodgers, Appellant, v. Gay Lynn Fife, Respondent.

Reginald Rodgers, Acting Pro Se, N.E.C.C. # 332791 (H.U. 5D–144), 13698 Airport Road, Bowling Green, MO 63334, Attorney for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew Jacob Crane, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, Attorney for Respondent.


Reginald Rodgers, Acting Pro Se, N.E.C.C. # 332791 (H.U. 5D–144), 13698 Airport Road, Bowling Green, MO 63334, Attorney for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Andrew Jacob Crane, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, Attorney for Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Reginald Rogers appeals from the dismissal of his declaratory judgment action, in which he sought a court order reinstating 184 days of credit toward his criminal sentence. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Fife

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.
Apr 19, 2016
500 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Rodgers v. Fife

Case Details

Full title:Reginald Rodgers, Appellant, v. Gay Lynn Fife, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Apr 19, 2016

Citations

500 S.W.3d 846 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)