From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roddy v. Lay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 26, 2013
09-CV-0848S(Sr) (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2013)

Opinion

09-CV-0848S(Sr)

11-26-2013

DERRICK RODDY, Plaintiff, v. LORI LAY and STEVE SWAIN, Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the assignment of this case to the undersigned to conduct all proceedings in this case, including the entry of final judgment. Dkt. #72.

By Decision and Order entered November 26, 2013, the Court appointed Cheryl Meyers Buth, Esq., Murphy Myers LLP, 6506 East Quaker Street, Suite 200, Orchard Park, New York, 14127, pro bono, to faithfully and diligently represent plaintiff in this case. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Groveland Correctional Facility Superintendent permit plaintiff's counsel, Cheryl Meyers Buth, and her associate counsel, Laurie Baker, the opportunity to conduct confidential telephone and/or video conferences with plaintiff via telephone and/or videoconference, at mutually agreeable dates and times; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff shall have access to necessary legal documents during such conferences and shall participate in the conferences in a private room.

SO ORDERED. DATED: Buffalo, New York

November 26, 2013

___________________________

H. KENNETH SCHROEDER, JR.

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Roddy v. Lay

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 26, 2013
09-CV-0848S(Sr) (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Roddy v. Lay

Case Details

Full title:DERRICK RODDY, Plaintiff, v. LORI LAY and STEVE SWAIN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 26, 2013

Citations

09-CV-0848S(Sr) (W.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2013)