From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roche v. Lamb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 19, 1970
33 A.D.2d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

February 19, 1970

Appeal from the Monroe Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ. [ 61 Misc.2d 633.]


Appeal unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs. Memorandum: The judgment appealed from prohibited the 1969 Council of the City of Rochester from conducting a hearing concerning the qualification of Councilman-elect Michael W. Roche to serve on the City Council to be organized on January 2, 1970, and also directed the City Clerk to accept Mr. Roche's oath of office as Councilman when offered to him for filing. The provisions of section 5-5 of the City Charter, that on the first business day of January following a municipal election the council shall organize and elect a Mayor, Vice Mayor, City Clerk, etc., show that the council is not a continuing body (cf. People ex rel. Lazarus v. Coleman, 99 App. Div. 88, 90). The City Council for the term ending December 31, 1969 ceased to exist at midnight on that date. That council could not now, of course, be reconvened to conduct the proposed hearing. In any event, the respondents acknowledge that the judgment prohibiting the conduct of such hearing does not extend to the present council and the incoming council has authority to rule upon the qualification of a member-elect for the term beginning January 1, 1970. Indeed, it has been respondent's contention that the new council, as opposed to the old one, has exclusive authority to make such ruling, and with that we agree (see 3 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, [3d ed., rev.], § 12.93, p. 406; 37 Am. Jur., Municipal Corporations, § 47). Despite a resolution of the 1969 City Council directing that the City Clerk refuse to accept the oath of office from Mr. Roche when offered, until the City Council had determined his qualifications to sit, on January 2, 1970, the City Clerk obeyed the judgment appealed from and accepted Mr. Roche's oath of office. Since no controversy remains with respect to said judgment, the appeal should be dismissed as moot (see 10 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, §§ 70:262, 70:297).


Summaries of

Roche v. Lamb

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 19, 1970
33 A.D.2d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Roche v. Lamb

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL W. ROCHE, Respondent, v. FRANK T. LAMB et al., as Members of the…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1970

Citations

33 A.D.2d 1102 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Nassau Trust Company v. Filderman

In view of these developments, the question of jurisdiction over defendant, which is the only issue raised on…

City of Binghamton v. Monserrate

The District Attorney has voluntarily resumed the very activity that appellants sought to compel him to…