From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rocchio v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 28, 2011
08 Civ. 3796 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2011)

Opinion

08 Civ. 3796 (JSR).

March 28, 2011


ORDER


On November 19, 2010, the Honorable Frank Maas, United States Magistrate Judge, issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") in the above-captioned matter regarding the pending motions of plaintiff Benedetto Rocchio and defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, for judgment on the pleadings. The Report recommended that the Court grant both motions in part and deny both motions in part. None of the parties has filed any objection to the Report, and, for that reason alone, the parties have waived any right to further appellate review. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147-48 (1985); Wagner Wagner, LLP v. Atkinson, Haskins, Nellis, Brittingham, Gladd Carwile, P.C., 596 F.3d 84, 92 (2d Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report, and, for the reasons stated therein, grants both motions in part, denies both motions in part, and directs that the case be continued solely to develop the record more fully with respect to Rocchio's visual impairments.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rocchio v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 28, 2011
08 Civ. 3796 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Rocchio v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BENEDETTO ROCCHIO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 28, 2011

Citations

08 Civ. 3796 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 2011)

Citing Cases

Stemmermann v. Colvin

"Because of the considerable weight ordinarily accorded to the opinions of treating physicians, an ALJ's duty…

Santiago v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Because of the considerable weight ordinarily accorded to the opinions of treating physicians, an ALJ's duty…