From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robles v. State

New York State Court of Claims
Mar 13, 2015
# 2015-050-012 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. Mar. 13, 2015)

Opinion

# 2015-050-012 Claim No. 119265 Motion No. M-86128

03-13-2015

TRISHA ROBLES v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C. By: Anthony Colantonio, Esq. Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman, NYS Attorney General By: Felicia G. Notaro, Assistant Attorney General


Synopsis

The attorney of record for the claimant moves for an order granting leave to withdraw as counsel for claimant. There is no opposition to the motion. Irreconcilable differences exist between claimant and claimant's attorney of record. The motion to withdraw as counsel is granted, the requested charging lien is denied, without prejudice.

Case information


UID:

2015-050-012

Claimant(s):

TRISHA ROBLES

Claimant short name:

ROBLES

Footnote (claimant name) :

Defendant(s):

THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Footnote (defendant name) :

Third-party claimant(s):

Third-party defendant(s):

Claim number(s):

119265

Motion number(s):

M-86128

Cross-motion number(s):

Judge:

STEPHEN J. LYNCH

Claimant's attorney:

Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C. By: Anthony Colantonio, Esq.

Defendant's attorney:

Hon. Eric T. Schneiderman, NYS Attorney General By: Felicia G. Notaro, Assistant Attorney General

Third-party defendant's attorney:

Signature date:

March 13, 2015

City:

Hauppauge

Comments:

Official citation:

Appellate results:

See also (multicaptioned case)


Decision

The attorney of record for the claimant moves for an order granting leave to withdraw as counsel. Claimant's counsel also seeks the establishment of a charging lien. The defendant has filed an "affirmation in response" taking no position as to the relief sought by movant but requesting that, if any stay be granted, it not exceed 90 days.

It is uncontroverted in the context of this unopposed motion that irreconcilable differences exist between claimant and claimant's attorney of record. Based on these circumstances the branch of the motion which seeks permission to withdraw is granted (see Sansiviero v Sanders, 117 AD2d 794 [2d Dept 1986]) and the Law Offices of Silberstein, Awad & Miklos, P.C. is granted leave to withdraw conditioned upon it serving the claimant with a copy of this decision and order within 30 days of the date of filing of this decision and order and filing proof of such service with the Clerk of this Court in Albany within 45 days of the date of filing of this decision and order. Upon compliance herewith, a stay shall exist for a period of 60 days (from the filing of such proof of service of this decision and order upon claimant) to permit claimant time to obtain substitute counsel. In the event new counsel does not appear within that 60-day period, claimant will be deemed to be proceeding on a self-represented basis herein.

The branch of the motion requesting a charging lien is denied without prejudice. Movant provided inaccurate documentary evidence regarding actual costs expended in pursuing the within claim in this Court, including in its detailing of expenses items which appear to relate to a separate action in the Supreme Court.

March 13, 2015

Hauppauge, New York

STEPHEN J. LYNCH

Judge of the Court of Claims

The following papers were read and considered by the Court on the claimant's attorney's motion to be relieved as counsel of record:

1. Order to Show Cause, Affirmation in Support with Exhibits A through D.

2. Affirmation in Response.


Summaries of

Robles v. State

New York State Court of Claims
Mar 13, 2015
# 2015-050-012 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. Mar. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Robles v. State

Case Details

Full title:TRISHA ROBLES v. THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Court:New York State Court of Claims

Date published: Mar 13, 2015

Citations

# 2015-050-012 (N.Y. Ct. Cl. Mar. 13, 2015)