From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robitaille v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 26, 1972
266 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. P-137.

September 26, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Bay County, Warren L. Fitzpatrick, J.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and Michael J. Minerva, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and William E. Whitlock, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellant was convicted on charges of rape, robbery, and a crime against nature pursuant to a jury verdict.

Appellant correctly contends that the sentence imposed upon him in connection with the charges of committing a crime against nature must be vacated and the judgment of conviction thereon reversed on authority of the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Franklin v. State, 257 So.2d 21. The Attorney General agrees with the appellant that the conviction and sentence on that charge must be vacated. Accordingly, as compelled to do by the Supreme Court's decision in Franklin, we reverse appellant's conviction on the crime against nature charges and remand that count to the trial court for resentencing under the lesser included offense of committing an unnatural act, as did the court in Franklin.

In all other respects, the judgments appealed herein are affirmed.

SPECTOR, C.J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robitaille v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 26, 1972
266 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Robitaille v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALVIN CHARLES ROBITAILLE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 26, 1972

Citations

266 So. 2d 675 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Paige v. State

The courts have also remanded for an adjudication of guilt on the lesser offense in such situations without…