From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Wellman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 26, 2007
234 F. App'x 70 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6667.

Submitted: July 18, 2007.

Decided: July 26, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03102).

Carl Lee Robinson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Carl Lee Robinson, Jr., appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and denying his motion for preliminary injunction, motion to amend his complaint and requests for discovery as moot. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Robinson v. Wellman, No. 5:06-ct-03102 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Wellman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 26, 2007
234 F. App'x 70 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Robinson v. Wellman

Case Details

Full title:Carl Lee ROBINSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. R. WELLMAN; Frank O'Neal…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 26, 2007

Citations

234 F. App'x 70 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Haste

We disagreed and affirmed the district court's judgment. See United States v. Haste, 234 Fed.Appx. 70 (4th…