From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 8, 1982
423 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AN-306.

December 8, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Ralph W. Nimmons, J.

William Mack Robinson, pro se., petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.


Appellant William Mack Robinson's motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 does not meet the minimal requirements of the rule for review. For example, the motion does not set forth: (1) the judgment or sentence under attack; (2) whether an appeal from the judgment or sentence was filed and if so, the disposition thereof; (3) whether previous post-conviction relief motion(s) were filed and if so, how many; or (4) a brief statement of supportive facts. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850(a)(b)(c)(e). We affirm the lower court's denial of the motion, but we do so without prejudice to appellant's refiling of the motion in proper form. Cowick v. State, 419 So.2d 779 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

SHAW and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 8, 1982
423 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Robinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM MACK ROBINSON, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 8, 1982

Citations

423 So. 2d 466 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

McElroy v. State

We note that the motion is deficient in at least three respects: (1) it does not include specific information…

Cherry v. State

Numerous decisions from this court have affirmed the summary denial of a motion for post-conviction relief…