From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 12, 1997
702 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Summary

holding that illicit drug use, because it is also a crime, constitutes a substantive violation of youthful offender probation

Summary of this case from Christian v. State

Opinion

Case No. 96-3463

Opinion filed December 12, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Tonya Rainwater, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Kenneth Witts, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jennifer Meek, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Robinson admits violating his probation in two criminal cases. He was sentenced in case number 93-2135 to a 10-year term, which he argues on appeal, is illegal because it exceeds the 6-year cap for youthful offenders. At the time Robinson was convicted of this crime, he was only 16 years old, and he was sentenced as a youthful offender. We affirm.

Robbery in case number 93-2135; robbery and grand theft in case number 95-25895.

Section 958.14, Florida Statutes (1993) provides:

[N]o youthful offender shall be committed to the custody of the Department for a substantive violation [of probation or community control] for a period longer than the maximum sentence for the offense for which he was found guilty . . . or for a technical or a non-substantive violation for a period longer than 6 years or for a period longer than the maximum sentence for the offense for which he was found guilty, whichever is less . . .

This section permits a youthful offender to be sentenced to a term longer than 6 years, after revocation of probation if the violation is substantive. Hill v. State, 692 So.2d 277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); Dunbar v. State, 664 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Johnson v. State, 678 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

In this case, Robinson claims his violations of probation were only technical. However, he admitted to the use of marijuana and to testing positive for marijuana in connection with his probation revocation. This is an admission of a criminal offense. See § 893.13, Fla. Stat. (1995). Committing a new criminal offense is a substantive violation of probation. Thus Robinson can be sentenced in excess of the 6-year limit for youthful offenders. His sentence is within the statutory maximum for robbery.

See Thomas v. State, 585 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Fifteen years. §§ 812.13(2)(c) and 775.082(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (1993).

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robinson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 12, 1997
702 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

holding that illicit drug use, because it is also a crime, constitutes a substantive violation of youthful offender probation

Summary of this case from Christian v. State

holding that when youthful offender had committed new criminal offense that was substantive violation of probation, he could be sentenced in excess of general six-year limit for youthful offenders

Summary of this case from Drost v. State

rejecting defendant’s argument that his violations of probation were only technical given that he admitted using marijuana and testing positive for marijuana in connection with his probation revocation

Summary of this case from Nolan v. State
Case details for

Robinson v. State

Case Details

Full title:JASPER ROBINSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 12, 1997

Citations

702 So. 2d 1346 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Swilley v. State

Courts examining the Youthful Offender Act have defined "substantive violation" as a new, separate criminal…

State v. Meeks

Numerous Florida cases have recognized the distinction between substantive versus technical/nonsubstantive…