From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Louisville Metro Jefferson County

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville
Feb 6, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08CV-574-H (W.D. Ky. Feb. 6, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08CV-574-H.

February 6, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Both Defendants, Metro Government and Teamsters Local 783, have moved to dismiss the complaint against them. The complaint asserts that Metro Government unlawfully discharged Plaintiff and that Local 783 did not adequately represent him.

Plaintiff has not stated a cause of action against Local 783 under either federal statutes or the Constitution of the United States. Plaintiff essentially alleges some form of a state law tort claim. Consequently, this Court would not have federal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

The same is true as to his allegations against Metro Government. Plaintiff does not assert discrimination or harassment against a specified class. He only asserts a state law tort claim of some kind.

Being otherwise sufficiently advised,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motions to dismiss are SUSTAINED and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE due to the absence of federal jurisdiction.

This is a final order.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Louisville Metro Jefferson County

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville
Feb 6, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08CV-574-H (W.D. Ky. Feb. 6, 2009)
Case details for

Robinson v. Louisville Metro Jefferson County

Case Details

Full title:GARY B. ROBINSON, SR. PLAINTIFF v. LOUISVILLE METRO JEFFERSON COUNTY AND…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville

Date published: Feb 6, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08CV-574-H (W.D. Ky. Feb. 6, 2009)