From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. J.A. Wiertel Construction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1992
185 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Summary

stating "[i]f a debtor fails to schedule an asset, the asset cannot be `dealt with' during the bankruptcy and, therefore, title to the asset remains in the bankruptcy estate."

Summary of this case from Dorsett-Felicelli, Inc. v. County of Clinton

Opinion

July 14, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie Conty, Sedita, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Balio, Lawton and Doerr, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court correctly determined that plaintiff lacked standing to pursue a claim for personal injuries against defendant Benderson Development Co., Inc., because the cause of action remained the property of the bankruptcy estate. All property, including a cause of action for personal injuries, becomes the property of the bankruptcy estate (see, Seward v. Devine, 888 F.2d 957). All assets of the debtor must be listed on the schedule of assets ( 11 U.S.C. § 521). If a debtor fails to schedule an asset, the asset cannot be "dealt with" during the bankruptcy and, therefore, title to the asset remains in the bankruptcy estate (see, Dynamics Corp. v. Marine Midland Bank, 69 N.Y.2d 191, 196-197). Having failed to list a personal injury cause of action against Benderson on his schedule of assets, plaintiff is precluded from pursuing the claim (see, Matter of C M Plastics [Collins], 168 A.D.2d 160, 161; DeLarco v. DeWitt, 136 A.D.2d 406, 408).

Plaintiff's argument that the Trustee was aware of his personal injury action and abandoned it is without merit. A Trustee cannot abandon an asset unless notice of the abandonment is given to the creditors of the debtor and the creditors are provided with an opportunity to be heard ( 11 U.S.C. § 554). There can be no abandonment without notice (see, Sierra Switchboard Co. v Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 789 F.2d 705). The record reveals that plaintiff's bankruptcy was treated as a "no asset" case, and there is no evidence that notice of the abandonment of plaintiff's personal injury cause of action against Benderson was given to plaintiff's creditors. Consequently, plaintiff's complaint was properly dismissed.


Summaries of

Robinson v. J.A. Wiertel Construction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1992
185 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

stating "[i]f a debtor fails to schedule an asset, the asset cannot be `dealt with' during the bankruptcy and, therefore, title to the asset remains in the bankruptcy estate."

Summary of this case from Dorsett-Felicelli, Inc. v. County of Clinton
Case details for

Robinson v. J.A. Wiertel Construction

Case Details

Full title:MARK ROBINSON, Appellant, v. J.A. WIERTEL CONSTRUCTION, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1992

Citations

185 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
586 N.Y.S.2d 59

Citing Cases

Rosenshein v. Kleban

By contrast, property that is not formally scheduled is not abandoned and therefore remains part of the…

Niedermeier v. St. Joseph Hospital

With respect to the issue of abandonment, our Appellate Division has noted that "[a] Trustee cannot abandon…