From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Freidman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 28, 2020
18-cv-2409 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2020)

Opinion

18-cv-2409 (PMH)

07-28-2020

JAMES ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. JANICE LYNN WOLF FREIDMAN, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER :

On May 15, 2020, Defendants filed their motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Doc. 93). Plaintiff's opposition brief was due June 17, 2020. (See Doc. 92). To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to Defendants' motion or sought an extension of time to oppose. The Court sua sponte extends plaintiff's time to oppose Defendants' motion to dismiss to August 28, 2020. Defendants' reply, if any, is due September 11, 2020. If plaintiff fails to file his opposition by August 28, 2020, the motion will be deemed fully submitted and unopposed. No further extensions of time will be granted. Defendants are instructed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and provide proof of service on the docket by July 30, 2020.

SO ORDERED: Dated: New York, New York

July 28, 2020

/s/_________

Philip M. Halpern

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Robinson v. Freidman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 28, 2020
18-cv-2409 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Robinson v. Freidman

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. JANICE LYNN WOLF FREIDMAN, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 28, 2020

Citations

18-cv-2409 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2020)