From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. First State Cmty. Action Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Nov 30, 2016
No. 14-cv-1205 (RGA) (D. Del. Nov. 30, 2016)

Opinion

No. 14-cv-1205 (RGA)

11-30-2016

TAMRA ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. FIRST STATE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

At the pre-trial conference, Defendant objected to Plaintiff's designation of Karen Garrett and David Bull as hostile witnesses before they took the stand. The focus of Defendant's concern, however, was Plaintiff's ability to ask leading questions. Federal Rule of Evidence 611 resolves the dispute. It directs a court to allow leading questions "when a party calls a hostile witness, an adverse party, or a witness identified with an adverse party." Rule 611(c)(2). As employees of Defendant, Ms. Garrett and Mr. Bull are "witness[es] identified with an adverse party." See Vanemmerik v. The Ground Round, Inc., 1998 WL 474106, at *1 (E.D. Pa. July 18, 1998) (citing Rule 611 and Perkins v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., 596 F.2d 681, 682 (5th Cir. 1979)).

Defendant's objection is OVERRULED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30 day of November 2016.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Robinson v. First State Cmty. Action Agency

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Nov 30, 2016
No. 14-cv-1205 (RGA) (D. Del. Nov. 30, 2016)
Case details for

Robinson v. First State Cmty. Action Agency

Case Details

Full title:TAMRA ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. FIRST STATE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Date published: Nov 30, 2016

Citations

No. 14-cv-1205 (RGA) (D. Del. Nov. 30, 2016)