From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Ferens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1969
33 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

November 3, 1969


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated May 14, 1969, in favor of defendant upon the verdict of a jury after a trial on the issues of liability only. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The findings of fact below have been affirmed. In our opinion, the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to have the summations recorded (cf. Devine v. Keller, 32 A.D.2d 34, 36; Croix v. New York City Tr. Auth., 28 A.D.2d 691; Sharp v. City of Hornell, 12 A.D.2d 1002) and in refusing to charge section 60 of the New York City Traffic Regulations as requested ( Taggart v. Vogel, 3 N.Y.2d 58, 60). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Ferens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 3, 1969
33 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Robinson v. Ferens

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN ROBINSON, an Infant, by His Mother MOTY B. ROBINSON, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Norman

Henry J. Smith and Gerald Nolan for respondent. MEMORANDUM. The trial court's failure to order the recording…

Williams v. Norman

In addition, the Trial Judge promised that in his charge he would explain the reason for the dismissal of the…