From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robinson v. Crow

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Aug 11, 2021
No. CIV-21-230-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 11, 2021)

Opinion

CIV-21-230-RAW-KEW

08-11-2021

DAMION M. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. SCOTT CROW, Warden, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

RONALD A. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Now before the court is Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. It has come to the court's attention that Petitioner was convicted in Tulsa County, Oklahoma, which is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the Nortrhern District of Oklahoma. Therefore, in the furtherance of justice, this matter may be more properly addressed in that district.

Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d), Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred to the Northern District of Oklahoma for all further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Robinson v. Crow

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Aug 11, 2021
No. CIV-21-230-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 11, 2021)
Case details for

Robinson v. Crow

Case Details

Full title:DAMION M. ROBINSON, Petitioner, v. SCOTT CROW, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma

Date published: Aug 11, 2021

Citations

No. CIV-21-230-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Aug. 11, 2021)