Robinson v. County of San Joaquin

Full title: ANTHONY W. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 5, 2013

2:12-cv-2783 MCE GGH PS (E.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2013)

Opinion

ANTHONY W. ROBINSON, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., Defendants. No. 2:12-cv-2783 MCE GGH PS United States District Court, E.D. California. August 5, 2013

          ORDER

          MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., District Judge.

         On May 30, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

         Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States , 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist. , 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

         The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed May 30, 2013, are ADOPTED and

         1. Defendant's motion to dismiss, filed April 3, 2012, (dkt. no. 9), is granted in part;

         2. Defendant Solis is dismissed with prejudice from this action;

         3. All state law claims are dismissed; and

         4. Defendant County is ordered to file an answer to the Title VII claim within twenty-eight days of this order.