Opinion
No. 10-56885 D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00161-H-BLM
02-29-2012
NEHEMIAH ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. T. CATLETT, Sergeant; et al., Defendants - Appellees.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, AND BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Nehemiah Robinson appeals pro se from the district court's order denying his motion for reconsideration in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants delayed assigning him to a lower bunk, confiscated his cane, denied him pain medication, and retaliated against him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, Nunes v. Ashcroft, 375 F.3d 805, 807 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Robinson's post-judgment motion because Robinson failed to show any newly discovered evidence, intervening change in controlling law, clear error, or manifest injustice. See id. at 807-08 (setting forth grounds justifying reconsideration).
Robinson's remaining contentions are unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.