From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
CV10-05306 ODW (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)

Opinion


Thomas Robins v. Spokeo, Inc. No. CV10-05306 ODW (AGRx) United States District Court, C.D. California. September 19, 2011

          CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

          OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.

         Proceedings (In Chambers): Order Correcting Prior Ruling [52] and Finding Moot Motion for Certification. [57]

         Upon further review, the Court finds it necessary to strike the standing discussion from its May 11, 2011 Order. (Docket No. 52.) In its stead, the Court reinstates the January 27, 2011 Order, which found that Plaintiff fails to establish standing. ( See Docket No. 35.) Among other things, the alleged harm to Plaintiff's employment prospects is speculative, attenuated and implausible. Mere violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act does not confer Article III standing, moreover, where no injury in fact is properly pled. Otherwise, federal courts will be inundated by web surfers' endless complaints. Plaintiff also fails to allege facts sufficient to trace his alleged harm to Spokeo's alleged violations. In short, Plaintiff fails to establish his standing before this Court. This action is therefore DISMISSED. Spokeo's motion for certification of appeal is MOOT.

         SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Sep 19, 2011
CV10-05306 ODW (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Sep 19, 2011

Citations

CV10-05306 ODW (AGRx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2011)