Opinion
No. 3143.
October 6, 1924. Rehearing Denied December 2, 1924.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Wm. N. Runyon, Judge.
A. Dayton Oliphant, of Trenton, N.J. (A.M. Houghton, of Washington, D.C., and D.A. Woodcock and F.P. Warfield, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Dean, Fairbank, Obrieght Hirsch, of New York City (Clair W. Fairbank and Irving M. Obrieght, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.
Before WOOLLEY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree dismissing a bill charging infringement of two patents — Robeson, No. 833,634, and Robeson, No. 1,069,029 — owned by the appellant. 293 F. 70. A mature consideration of the record, the briefs, and the thoughts advanced at the oral argument has convinced us that in the decree appealed from there is no error. The full and careful analysis and treatment of the issues of the case by the court below, with those opinion we are also in accord, makes unprofitable and unnecessary a comprehensive restatement or rediscussion of the case by this court.
The decree must be affirmed.