From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Schoonmaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1936
249 App. Div. 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

November 30, 1936.


Derivative action brought by the plaintiff as a stockholder of Marine Transit Corporation to recover a judgment directing restitution of property and assets of the corporation alleged to have been wrongfully diverted by directors and officers of the corporation, and for other relief. The complaint was dismissed on the merits and plaintiff served notice of appeal from the judgment. Thereafter he moved to continue with the prosecution of the action on appeal as a poor person and to have an attorney assigned to him for that purpose. His motion was denied and he appeals. Order, as resettled, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the right to sue in forma pauperis is purely statutory. Sections 558 and 196 of the Civil Practice Act, as amended by chapter 722 of the Laws of 1935, are in derogation of the common law and must be strictly construed. (McKinney's Statutes and Statutory Construction, book I, § 142, and cases cited; LaBarbera v. Hart Crouse Co., Inc., 248 App. Div. 261.) Thus construed, section 558 contemplates the taking or maintenance of an appeal by a party as a poor person only where that party has previously obtained an order authorizing him to sue or defend as such poor person. ( LaBarbera v. Hart Crouse Co., Inc., supra.) Young, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Robertson v. Schoonmaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1936
249 App. Div. 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Robertson v. Schoonmaker

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS O. ROBERTSON, Suing for Himself as Stockholder and All Other…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Howell v. Francesco

There is nothing in the language of the statute that permits an ex parte application for this designation to…