From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robertson v. Garrett

United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama
Feb 28, 2022
7:21-cv-01188-MHH-JHE (N.D. Ala. Feb. 28, 2022)

Opinion

7:21-cv-01188-MHH-JHE

02-28-2022

HEIDI ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN CHAD GARRETT, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

MADELINE HUGHES HAIKALA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Petitioner Heidi Robertson filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). On January 21, 2021, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant the respondent's motion to dismiss because Ms. Robertson did not exhaust her administrative remedies. (Docs. 6, 9). The magistrate judge advised the parties of their right to file specific objections within 14 days; the Court has not received objections.

Having reviewed the materials in the Court's electronic record, the Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's report and accepts his recommendation. By separate order, the Court will dismiss Ms. Robertson's petition without prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Robertson v. Garrett

United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama
Feb 28, 2022
7:21-cv-01188-MHH-JHE (N.D. Ala. Feb. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Robertson v. Garrett

Case Details

Full title:HEIDI ROBERTSON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN CHAD GARRETT, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Alabama

Date published: Feb 28, 2022

Citations

7:21-cv-01188-MHH-JHE (N.D. Ala. Feb. 28, 2022)