Robertson v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Full title: ROBERT ROBERTSON v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Jan 10, 2014

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv417 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:13cv417

01-10-2014

ROBERT ROBERTSON v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Ron Clark

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Robert Robertson, an inmate confined in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, brought this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.¹ It is therefore

1 Ordinarily the court would provide petitioner thirty days in which to pay the fee; however, the petitioner paid the filing fee following the Report being entered.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

__________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge