From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberts v. Joe

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Nov 19, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 90840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2011-3001 Q C

11-19-2012

Leonard Roberts, Jr., Appellant, v. Richard Joe, Respondent, and Chanel Davis, Defendant.


, P.J.

MICHELLE WESTON

JAIME A. RIOS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, entered April 27, 2011.

On the court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed on the ground that appellant submitted no papers in opposition to the motion of respondent giving rise to the order being appealed, thus, the order is deemed entered on default and is not appealable (see CPLR 5511; M & C Bros., Inc. v Torum, 75 AD3d 869 [2010]; Benitez v Olson, 29 AD3d 503 [2006]; Fox v T.B.S.D., Inc., 278 AD2d 612 [2000]). Appellant's remedy, if he be so advised, is to seek relief in the Civil Court upon a written motion.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

Roberts v. Joe

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts
Nov 19, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 90840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Roberts v. Joe

Case Details

Full title:Leonard Roberts, Jr., Appellant, v. Richard Joe, Respondent, and Chanel…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2nd, 11th, & 13th Judicial Districts

Date published: Nov 19, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 90840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)