Roberts v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of State

Full title: PAUL ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 21, 2015

No. 67961 (Nev. Jul. 21, 2015)

Opinion

No. 67961

07-21-2015

PAUL ROBERTS, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND JEROME TAO, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 20 Mueller Hinds & Associates Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

Saitta

An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging a district court decision allowing the State to file an information by affidavit. Petitioner did not submit an appendix with his petition, see NRAP 21(a)(4), thus he has not demonstrated circumstances warranting our review, see Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta
/s/_________, J.
Gibbons
/s/_________, J.
Pickering
cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 20

Mueller Hinds & Associates

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk