From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royal v. Saph, LLC

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 18, 2016
NO. 02-15-00364-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 02-15-00364-CV

08-18-2016

ROBERT ("BOB") ROYAL AND RR ROYAL RANCH COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION APPELLANTS v. SAPH, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AND HAPPY STATE BANK APPELLEES


FROM THE 415TH DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. CV15-1178 MEMORANDUM OPINIONAND JUDGMENT

On July 8, 2016, we notified appellants that their briefs had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We also notified appellant RR Royal Ranch Company that it had not timely filed a notice of new lead counsel as ordered by this court. We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellants or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellants' briefs have not been filed, and because appellant RR Royal Ranch Company has not filed a notice of new lead counsel, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. DELIVERED: August 18, 2016

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Royal v. Saph, LLC

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Aug 18, 2016
NO. 02-15-00364-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Royal v. Saph, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT ("BOB") ROYAL AND RR ROYAL RANCH COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Aug 18, 2016

Citations

NO. 02-15-00364-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 18, 2016)