From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberson v. Psychassociates Grp. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 20, 2016
15-CV-07766 (AT)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2016)

Opinion

15-CV-07766 (AT)(SN)

06-20-2016

JEMMA ROBERSON, Plaintiff, v. PSYCHASSOCIATES GROUP LLC, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER SARAH NETBURN, United States Magistrate Judge :

By letter dated June 16, 2016, pro se plaintiff Jemma Roberson request the appointment of pro bono counsel. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied without prejudice.

The Court has "broad discretion" when deciding whether to appoint counsel. See Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 60 (2d Cir. 1986); Burgos v. Hopkins, 14 F.3d 787, 789 (2d Cir. 1994). "There is no requirement that an indigent litigant be appointed pro bono counsel in civil matters." Id. at 789; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).

The factors to be considered in ruling on a motion for pro bono counsel include "the merits of plaintiff's case, the plaintiff's ability to pay for private counsel, [plaintiff's] efforts to obtain a lawyer, the availability of counsel, and the plaintiff's ability to gather the facts and deal with the issues if unassisted by counsel." Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989). Of these, "the factor which command[s] the most attention [is] the merits." Indeed:

Courts do not perform a useful service if they appoint a volunteer lawyer to a case which a private lawyer would not take if it were brought to his or her attention. Nor do courts perform a socially justified function when they request the services of a volunteer
lawyer for a meritless case that no lawyer would take were the plaintiff not indigent.

Id.

At this early stage of the litigation, the Court cannot assess the merits of Ms. Roberson's case. Accordingly, the Court concludes that Ms. Roberson's motion for appointment of counsel is premature and DENIES the motion without prejudice to refiling this request when the merits of Ms. Roberson's case have been more fully examined by the Court.

The Clerk of Court is requested to terminate the motion at Docket No. 22.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

SARAH NETBURN

United States Magistrate Judge DATED: New York, New York

June 20, 2016 cc: Jemma Roberson (by Chambers)

2588 Seventh Ave., #5D

New York, NY 10039


Summaries of

Roberson v. Psychassociates Grp. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 20, 2016
15-CV-07766 (AT)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2016)
Case details for

Roberson v. Psychassociates Grp. LLC

Case Details

Full title:JEMMA ROBERSON, Plaintiff, v. PSYCHASSOCIATES GROUP LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 20, 2016

Citations

15-CV-07766 (AT)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2016)