From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roberson v. L.T.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 13, 2023
1:19-cv-01724-ADA-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2023)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01724-ADA-EPG (PC)

01-13-2023

CLARENCE LONELL ROBERSON, Plaintiff, v. L.T., et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

(ECF Nos. 73 & 83)

Clarence Lonnell Roberson (“Plaintiff') is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On November 18, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that “[t]he Doe Defendants be dismissed from this action, without prejudice, because of Plaintiff's failure to provide the Court and the Marshal with accurate and sufficient information to effect service of the summons and complaint on the Doe Defendants within the time period prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m),” and that “[t]he Clerk of Court be directed to close this case.” (ECF No. 83 at 3-4).

Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to file objections to the findings and recommendations. The deadline for filing objections has passed and Plaintiff has not filed objections or otherwise responded to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.

Accordingly,

1. The findings and recommendations issued on November 18, 2022, (ECF No. 83), are adopted in full;
2. The Doe Defendants are dismissed from this action, without prejudice, because of Plaintiff's failure to provide the Court and the Marshal with accurate and sufficient information to effect service of the summons and complaint on the Doe Defendants within the time period prescribed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m); and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Roberson v. L.T.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 13, 2023
1:19-cv-01724-ADA-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Roberson v. L.T.

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE LONELL ROBERSON, Plaintiff, v. L.T., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 13, 2023

Citations

1:19-cv-01724-ADA-EPG (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2023)