From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Robair v. Chi St. Luke's Sugarland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jun 28, 2017
CIVIL ACTION H-16-776 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 28, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION H-16-776

06-28-2017

JOSEPHINE ROBAIR, Plaintiff, v. CHI ST. LUKE'S SUGARLAND, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court are the Magistrate Judge's memorandum and recommendation ("M&R") (Dkt. 63), plaintiff Josephine Robair's ("Plaintiff") objections (Dkt. 64), and defendant St. Luke's Community Development Corporation-Sugar Land d/b/a St. Luke's Sugar Land Hospital ("St. Luke's") response (Doc. 75). The Magistrate Judge recommended that St. Luke's motion for summary judgment be granted. Dkt. 63. Having conducted a de novo review of the M&R, plaintiff's objections, defendant's response to the objections, and applicable law, the court OVERRULES the objections and ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. As to Plaintiff's motions that have been filed since the M&R was filed (Dkt. 67, 69, and 71) , the court has reviewed them and determines that they are DENIED.

A final judgment shall be entered by separate order.

The M&R (Dkt. 63) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

Signed at Houston, Texas on June 28, 2017.

/s/_________

Gray H. Miller

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Robair v. Chi St. Luke's Sugarland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Jun 28, 2017
CIVIL ACTION H-16-776 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 28, 2017)
Case details for

Robair v. Chi St. Luke's Sugarland

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE ROBAIR, Plaintiff, v. CHI ST. LUKE'S SUGARLAND, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Jun 28, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION H-16-776 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 28, 2017)

Citing Cases

Canada v. Tex. Mut. Ins. Co.

Yet, Plaintiff cites no authority indicating an employer may not use a background check to screen candidates.…