From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roanoke v. Bray

Supreme Court of Virginia
Nov 16, 1933
161 Va. 609 (Va. 1933)

Opinion

36644

November 16, 1933

Present, Campbell, C.J., and Holt, Epes, Hudgins and Browning, JJ.

Error to judgments of the Hustings Court of the city of Roanoke, in proceedings against a city for correction of assessments. Judgments for applicants.

Reversed.

The opinion states the case.

Robert C. Jackson, for the plaintiff in error.

Woods, Chitwood, Coxe Rogers and Murray A. Foster, for the defendants in error.

Showalter, Parsons, Kuyk Coleman, for Ritchie, defendant in error.


These cases are controlled by City of Norfolk v. Snyder, ante, page 288, 170 S.E. 721; City of Roanoke v. Gibson, et als., ante, page 342, 170 S.E. 723, and City of Roanoke v. Williams, ante, page 351, 170 S.E. 726, decided by this court at its September term, 1933. It follows that the judgment appealed from in each instance must be reversed and the assessments, set aside by the trial court, reinstated. It is so ordered.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Roanoke v. Bray

Supreme Court of Virginia
Nov 16, 1933
161 Va. 609 (Va. 1933)
Case details for

Roanoke v. Bray

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF ROANOKE v. J. B. BRAY AND NANCY ELLEN BRAY, and CITY OF ROANOKE v…

Court:Supreme Court of Virginia

Date published: Nov 16, 1933

Citations

161 Va. 609 (Va. 1933)
171 S.E. 927

Citing Cases

Norfolk v. Holland

The doctrine laid down in the Snyder Case was reaffirmed in an opinion delivered by Justice Holt in City of…