From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan 6, 2022
330 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 4D21-1940

01-06-2022

R.M., the Father, Appellant, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Roger Ally of the Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant. Carolyn Schwarz, Children's Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Department of Children and Families. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorneys, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.


Roger Ally of the Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Carolyn Schwarz, Children's Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Department of Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorneys, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Damoorgian, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

R.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Jan 6, 2022
330 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

R.M. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.M., the Father, Appellant, v. State of Florida, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

330 So. 3d 915 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)