From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.M. v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District
Jan 6, 2022
No. 4D21-1940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 6, 2022)

Opinion

4D21-1940

01-06-2022

R.M., the Father, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee.

Roger Ally of the Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant. Carolyn Schwarz, Children's Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Department of Children and Families. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorneys, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jose Izquierdo, Judge; L.T. Case No. 20-910 CJ-DP.

Roger Ally of the Law Offices of Roger Ally, P.A., Hollywood, for appellant.

Carolyn Schwarz, Children's Legal Services, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Department of Children and Families.

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd Weitz and Samantha C. Valley, Senior Attorneys, Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian Ad Litem Program.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed.

Damoorgian, Ciklin and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

R.M. v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District
Jan 6, 2022
No. 4D21-1940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 6, 2022)
Case details for

R.M. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.M., the Father, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN…

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 6, 2022

Citations

No. 4D21-1940 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 6, 2022)