From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 13, 1999
745 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 99-1763.

Opinion filed October 13, 1999.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Wendell Graham, Judge, L.T. No. 96-11595.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Leonard J. Cooperman, Special Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Margaret A. Brenan, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and SORONDO, JJ.


Notwithstanding the appellant's very colorable and well argued claim that his constitutional right to compulsory process was erroneously denied below, see B.E. v. State, 564 So.2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), we affirm because he did not invoke his possible rights under section 90.803(23)(a)2b, Florida Statutes (1997), which would have obviated the constitutional question, 10 Fla.Jur.2d Constitutional Law §§ 63-65 (1997), and because the state has demonstrated beyond a reasonable doubt that any such error which may have nonetheless occurred did not affect the result and was therefore harmless. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

R.L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 13, 1999
745 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

R.L. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.L., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 13, 1999

Citations

745 So. 2d 391 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)