From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rizzuto v. Annucci

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 18, 2023
22-CV-7698 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2023)

Opinion

22-CV-7698 (CS)

01-18-2023

ALFONSO RIZZUTO, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY ANNUCCI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF SERVICE

CATHY SEIBEL, DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, arising from events that occurred in 2019, when he was incarcerated in Woodbourne Correctional Facility (“Woodbourne”). Plaintiff asserts that Defendants violated his rights by providing him inadequate medical care for a serious medical condition, failing to reasonably accommodate his disability, and failing to properly handle his grievances. By order dated September 9, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees.

DISCUSSION

Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)).

Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued.

To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants Anthony Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”); John Morley, Deputy Commissioner/Chief Medical Officer of DOCCS; Mary Anne McGrath, Associate Commissioner Population Management of DOCCS; Lynn Lilley, former Superintendent of Woodbourne; Reed Barnofsky, Grievance Director at Woodbourne; Denisha Goodman, Deputy Superintendent at Woodbourne; David Howard, Deputy Superintendent at Woodbourne; Miriam Weig, Nurse Administrator at Woodbourne; William Holloran, Lieutenant at Woodbourne; Frank Klepsis, Plant Superintendent at Woodbourne; and Ashley Harris-Baker, Nurse/Physician Assistant at Woodbourne, through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendants.

If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff's responsibility to request an extension of time for service).

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.

CONCLUSION

The Clerk of Court is directed to issue summonses for Annucci, Morley, McGrath, Lilley, Barnofsky, Goodman, Howard, Weig, Holloran, Klepsis, and Harris-Baker, complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for these defendants, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service.

The Clerk of Court is also directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES

1. Anthony Annucci

NYS DOCCS Acting Commissioner

1220 Washington Avenue

Albany, NY 12226

2. John Morley, MD

NYS DOCCS Deputy Commissioner/Chief Medical Officer

1220 Washington Avenue

Albany, NY 12226

3. Mary Anne McGrath

NYS DOCCS Associate Commissioner Population Management

1220 Washington Avenue

Albany, NY 12226

4. Lynn Lilley

Former Superintendent of Woodbourne Correctional Facility

30 Institution Road

Napanoch, NY 12458

5. Reed Barnofsky

Grievance Director

Woodbourne Correctional Facility

99 Prison Road

Woodbourne, NY 12788

6. Denisha Goodman

Deputy Superintendent

Woodbourne Correctional Facility

99 Prison Road

Woodbourne, NY 12788

7. David Howard

Deputy Superintendent

Woodbourne Correctional Facility

99 Prison Road

Woodbourne, NY 12788

8. Miriam Weig

Nurse Administrator

Woodbourne Correctional Facility

99 Prison Road

Woodbourne, NY 12788

William Holloran

Lieutenant

Woodbourne Correctional Facility

99 Prison Road

Woodbourne, NY 12788

10. Frank Klepsis

Plant Superintendent

Woodbourne Correctional Facility

99 Prison Road

Woodbourne, NY 12788

11. Ashley Harris-Baker

Nurse/Physician Assistant

Woodbourne Correctional Facility 99 Prison Road

Woodbourne, NY 12788


Summaries of

Rizzuto v. Annucci

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jan 18, 2023
22-CV-7698 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Rizzuto v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:ALFONSO RIZZUTO, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY ANNUCCI, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jan 18, 2023

Citations

22-CV-7698 (CS) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 18, 2023)

Citing Cases

Jadallah v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.

.'” Burris v. Nassau Cnt'y Dist. Att., No. 14 Civ. 5540 (PKC) (ARL), 2023 WL 6450398, at *5 (Sept. 30, 2023…