From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rizzo v. Torchiano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 2008
57 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-00658.

December 23, 2008.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), entered November 28, 2007, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff John M. Rizzo did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Richard T. Lau, Jericho, N.Y. (Kathleen E. Fioretti of counsel), for appellant.

Joachim, Frommer, Cerrato Levine, LLP, Garden City, N.Y. (Louis J. Cerrato and Mary Ellen O'Brien of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Covello, Balkin and Belen, JJ. concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff John M. Rizzo did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident ( see Staubitz v Yaser, 41 AD3d 698; O'Neal v Bronopolsky, 41 AD3d 452; Hughes v Cai, 31 AD3d 385). Accordingly, the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied without the need to consider the sufficiency of the plaintiff's' opposition papers.


Summaries of

Rizzo v. Torchiano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 2008
57 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Rizzo v. Torchiano

Case Details

Full title:JOHN M. RIZZO, et al., Respondents, v. VITO A. TORCHIANO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 10147
868 N.Y.S.2d 926

Citing Cases

Sutler v. Adams

He concludes that plaintiff may continue to work and perform her regular activities of daily living without…

Smith v. Taylor

In so moving, defendants have the initial burden of establishing prima facie entitlement to judgment as a…