From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rivers v. Hartfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Oct 29, 2019
8:19CV374 (D. Neb. Oct. 29, 2019)

Opinion

8:19CV374

10-29-2019

MARCUS RIVERS, Petitioner, v. RUTH ANGEL HARTFIELD, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before me on a Notice of Violation Warning, which I liberally construe as a motion. (Filing No. 12.) Petitioner asserts that the judgment entered on October 21, 2019, dismissing this matter without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, is void and demands the return of his minor child. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Notice of Violation Warning (filing no. 12), construed as a motion, is denied as frivolous.

Dated this 29th day of October, 2019.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Richard G. Kopf

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rivers v. Hartfield

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Oct 29, 2019
8:19CV374 (D. Neb. Oct. 29, 2019)
Case details for

Rivers v. Hartfield

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS RIVERS, Petitioner, v. RUTH ANGEL HARTFIELD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Date published: Oct 29, 2019

Citations

8:19CV374 (D. Neb. Oct. 29, 2019)