From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rivera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1326 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-04-24

In the Matter of the Claim of Arnaldo RIVERA, Respondent. BYRNE DAIRY, INC., Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (John T. McCann of counsel), for appellant. Cynthia Feathers, Glens Falls, for Arnaldo Rivera, respondent.


Hancock & Estabrook, LLP, Syracuse (John T. McCann of counsel), for appellant. Cynthia Feathers, Glens Falls, for Arnaldo Rivera, respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 2, 2012, which ruled that claimant was entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

After the employer received complaints from certain customers regarding stores not being merchandised properly, claimant, who was the merchandiser assigned to these stores and had been previously warned regarding his job performance, was terminated. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant's unsatisfactory job performance did not constitute disqualifying misconduct and found him eligible for benefits. The employer appeals.

We affirm. “Not every discharge for cause rises to the level of misconduct disqualifying a claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits” (Matter of Donovan [Bay Orthopedic & Rehabilitation Supply Co.—Commissioner of Labor], 96 A.D.3d 1312, 1312, 947 N.Y.S.2d 670 [2012] [citations omitted] ). Here, the Board chose to credit claimant's explanations regarding his job performance that support a conclusion that he was not “deliberately failing to carry out his job duties.” Inasmuch as “[t]he Board is the final arbiter of factual matters involving questions of credibility ..., we cannot conclude that the Board abused its discretion in finding claimant to be eligible for benefits” (Matter of Poladian [Smithmyer—Commissioner of Labor], 87 A.D.3d 1196, 1197, 929 N.Y.S.2d 339 [2011] [internal citations omitted]; see Matter of Garcia [BS & F Auto Parts, Inc.—Commissioner of Labor], 104 A.D.3d 985, 986, 960 N.Y.S.2d 267 [2013] ).

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs. PETERS, P.J., STEIN, McCARTHY and ROSE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Rivera

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 24, 2014
116 A.D.3d 1326 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

In re Rivera

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Arnaldo RIVERA, Respondent. BYRNE DAIRY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 24, 2014

Citations

116 A.D.3d 1326 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2834
983 N.Y.S.2d 917