From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritter v. Montoya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 8, 2020
20-CV-0114 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-0114 (CM)

01-08-2020

GREGORY RITTER, Plaintiff, v. OFC MONTOYA; OFC DOE; NURSE STILLGS; DOCTOR OF RECORD, MCC MANHATTAN, Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PRISONER AUTHORIZATION :

Plaintiff, currently incarcerated in the Metropolitan Correction Center in Chicago, Illinois, brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a prisoner must either pay $400.00 in fees - a $350.00 filing fee plus a $50.00 administrative fee - or, to request permission to proceed without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application and a prisoner authorization. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. If the Court grants a prisoner's IFP application, the Prison Litigation Reform Act requires the Court to collect the $350.00 filing fee in installments deducted from the prisoner's prison trust fund account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). A prisoner seeking to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees must therefore also authorize the Court to withdraw these payments from his prison trust fund account by filing a "prisoner authorization," which directs the facility where the prisoner is incarcerated to deduct the $350.00 filing fee from the prisoner's prison trust fund account in installments and to send to this Court certified copies of the prisoner's prison trust fund account statements for the past six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), (b).

The $50.00 administrative fee for filing a civil action does not apply to persons granted IFP status under 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Plaintiff submitted an IFP application, but did not submit a prisoner authorization. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 in fees or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization. If Plaintiff submits the prisoner authorization, he should label it with docket number 20-CV-0114 (CM).

Plaintiff is cautioned that if a prisoner files a federal civil action that is dismissed as frivolous or malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, the dismissal is a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). A prisoner who receives three "strikes" cannot file federal civil actions IFP as a prisoner, unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury, and must pay the relevant fees at the time of filing any new federal civil action.

The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket, mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the Court shall process the case in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the Court will dismiss the action.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 8, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ritter v. Montoya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jan 8, 2020
20-CV-0114 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Ritter v. Montoya

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY RITTER, Plaintiff, v. OFC MONTOYA; OFC DOE; NURSE STILLGS; DOCTOR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jan 8, 2020

Citations

20-CV-0114 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2020)