From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritter v. Milk Ice Cream Drivers Dairy

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 1, 1940
27 N.E.2d 406 (Ohio 1940)

Opinion

No. 28040

Decided May 1, 1940.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Restraint of trade — Contract between milk dealers and union — Giving union exclusive right to distribute milk — Fixing wholesale and retail price of milk — Section 6390 et seq., General Code — Sections 1 and 2, Article I, Section 26, Article II, Ohio Constitution — Section 1, 14th Amendment to U.S. Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Charles Auerbach and Mr. Ray T. Miller, for appellants.

Messrs. Payer, Corrigan Bleiweiss, for appellee, Milk Ice Cream Drivers Dairy Employees' Union.

Messrs. Baker, Hostetler Patterson and Mr. Clayton A. Quintrell, for appellee, The Telling Belle-Vernon Company.

Messrs. Thompson, Hine Flory, for appellee, Dairymen's Milk Company.


It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ritter v. Milk Ice Cream Drivers Dairy

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 1, 1940
27 N.E.2d 406 (Ohio 1940)
Case details for

Ritter v. Milk Ice Cream Drivers Dairy

Case Details

Full title:RITTER ET AL., APPELLANTS v. MILK ICE CREAM DRIVERS DAIRY EMPLOYEES UNION…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 1, 1940

Citations

27 N.E.2d 406 (Ohio 1940)
136 Ohio St. 582

Citing Cases

Badgett v. Departments of Industrial Relations

Dept. of Industrial Relations v. Drummond, Ala.App., 1 So.2d 395; Id., 241 Ala. 142, 1 So.2d 402; Bodinson…