From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritter v. Mason

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1858
11 Cal. 214 (Cal. 1858)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, County of San Francisco.

         COUNSEL:

         E. B. Mastick, for Appellant.

          J. B. Hart, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Field, J., at the April Term, 1858, delivered the opinion of the Court. Terry, C. J., and Burnett, J., concurring.

         OPINION

          FIELD, Judge

         The stipulations inserted in the transcript are not embodied in any statement or bill of exceptions, and form, therefore, no part of the record; and there is no certificate of the Judge or Clerk, or any admission of counsel, that the affidavits constitute the papers used on the motion to open the judgment. There is left for our consideration only the judgment roll, which discloses no error. Practice Act, section 346; Newland v. Kean, and Davis v. Stratton, January Term, 1856; Yates v. Buckingham, 4 Cal. 286.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Ritter v. Mason

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1858
11 Cal. 214 (Cal. 1858)
Case details for

Ritter v. Mason

Case Details

Full title:RITTER v. MASON

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1858

Citations

11 Cal. 214 (Cal. 1858)

Citing Cases

Lick v. Ray

It will be presumed that there was sufficient evidence of all the averments of the complaint to justify the…

De Leon v. Higuera

The trial and decision were at the proper place; the record cannot be contradicted; there is nothing to show…