From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ritter v. Farrow

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Jun 24, 2014
851 N.W.2d 471 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

Nos. 2012AP781 2013AP927.

2014-06-24

Ted RITTER and Carolyn Ritter d/b/a Ritter Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. Tony FARROW and Arlyce Farrow d/b/a Farrow Enterprises, Inc., Defendants–Respondents, Bibs Resort Condominium, Inc., Proposed–Intervenor–Appellant. Ted Ritter And Carol Ritter, d/b/a Ritter Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Tony Farrow And Arlyce Farrow, d/b/a Farrow Enterprises, Inc., Defendants–Respondents.

We agree with the Association that the temporary injunction and the court's contempt ruling created a “chilling effect” likely to deter the Association and the individual unit owners from using the phrase “Bibs Resort Condominium” for business and marketing purposes.



Summaries of

Ritter v. Farrow

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Jun 24, 2014
851 N.W.2d 471 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Ritter v. Farrow

Case Details

Full title:Ted RITTER and Carolyn Ritter d/b/a Ritter Enterprises, Inc.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Date published: Jun 24, 2014

Citations

851 N.W.2d 471 (Wis. Ct. App. 2014)
355 Wis. 2d 577
2014 WI App. 83