From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rittenberry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Dec 6, 2021
No. 04-21-00331-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2021)

Opinion

04-21-00331-CR

12-06-2021

John Darrick RITTENBERRY, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas Trial Court No. B20109 Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On November 29, 2021, appellant filed a pro se motion titled, "Motion for De Nov[o] Appeal from Trial Court Cause #B20109." However, appellant is represented by appellate counsel, Mr. M. Patrick Maguire. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981); Barnes v. State, 103 S.W.3d 494, 496 n.2 (Tex. App-San Antonio 2003, no pet.). Therefore, appellant's pro se motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Rittenberry v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Dec 6, 2021
No. 04-21-00331-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2021)
Case details for

Rittenberry v. State

Case Details

Full title:John Darrick RITTENBERRY, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Dec 6, 2021

Citations

No. 04-21-00331-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 6, 2021)