From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Rosenberg

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 28, 2005
839 N.E.2d 29 (Ohio 2005)

Opinion

No. 2005-0459.

Submitted October 12, 2005.

Decided December 28, 2005.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 84457, 2005-Ohio-101.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark J. Mahoney, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Thomas Rein, for appellee.


{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, O'DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

LUNDBERG STRATTON and O'CONNOR, JJ., dissent.


{¶ 2} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in State v. Cummings, 107 Ohio St.3d 1206, 2005-Ohio-6506, ___ N.E.2d ___, I respectfully dissent.

O'CONNOR, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.


Summaries of

State v. Rosenberg

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 28, 2005
839 N.E.2d 29 (Ohio 2005)
Case details for

State v. Rosenberg

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. ROSENBERG, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 28, 2005

Citations

839 N.E.2d 29 (Ohio 2005)
839 N.E.2d 29
2005 Ohio 6510

Citing Cases

State v. Rosenberg

RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS Reported at 107 Ohio St.3d 1209, 2005-Ohio-6510, 839 N.E.2d 29. On motion…

State v. Day

" Id. Likewise, we have determined that a defendant is not apprised of his constitutional right to compulsory…