From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 28, 1987
510 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-2460.

July 21, 1987. Rehearing Denied August 28, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Arthur Maginnis, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Randolph Q. Ferguson and John H. Lipinski, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and PEARSON, DANIEL S., JJ.


This is an appeal by the defendant Leonel Rios from judgments of conviction and sentences for the crimes of (1) second-degree murder, and (2) unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense. We affirm. First, we see no merit in the defendant's claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his confession. There was sufficient evidence adduced below establishing that the defendant waived his Miranda rights and otherwise gave a free and voluntary confession. Jones v. State, 440 So.2d 570 (Fla. 1983). Because adversary proceedings had not been instituted against the defendant at the time he confessed, the defendant's reliance on Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387, 97 S.Ct. 1232, 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977), and Traylor v. State, 498 So.2d 1297 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), is completely misplaced.

Second, we see no merit in the defendant's claim that the three-year mandatory minimum sentence imposed on the second-degree murder conviction under Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1985) was improper. The defendant was found guilty by the jury's verdict of "second degree murder, a lesser included offense of count one of the indictment"; the indictment, in turn, charged the defendant with first-degree murder with a firearm. It therefore follows that the jury by its verdict made a finding that the defendant committed the murder as charged in the indictment with a firearm, but without the premeditation or felony-murder element required for first-degree murder. See §§ 782.04(1)(a)(1), (2), Fla. Stat. (1985). This being so, it is plain that the trial court properly imposed the mandatory three-year minimum sentence herein on the second-degree murder conviction based on Section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1985), because the jury found the defendant guilty of a crime which involves a firearm. State v. Overfelt, 457 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 1984).

The final judgments of conviction and sentences under review are, in all respects,

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rios v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 28, 1987
510 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Rios v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEONEL RIOS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 28, 1987

Citations

510 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Bowser v. State

We write only to address the defendant's argument that the trial court erroneously imposed a 3-year mandatory…

Small v. State

Although it is necessary for the jury to make the finding that the crime was committed with the firearm,…