From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rios v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 16, 1973
477 F.2d 288 (9th Cir. 1973)

Summary

In Rios v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Company et al., 477 F.2d 288 the Ninth Circuit sustained the validity of the Oregon Workmen's Compensation law in respect to the computing of compensation of injured farmworkers, a class that represents a racial minority.

Summary of this case from Massey v. Thiokol Chemical Corp.

Opinion

No. 72-3036.

April 16, 1973.

Glenn D. Ramirez, Ramirez Hoots, Klamath Falls, Or., for plaintiff-appellant.

Lee Johnson, State Atty. Gen., John W. Osborn, Sol. Gen., Al J. Laue, Clayton Hess, Asst. Attys. Gen., Charles Paulson, Gerald R. Pullen, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.


This appeal is from an order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissing the complaint. We agree with the court below that the section of Oregon's Workmen's Compensation Law in question, O.R.S. 656.210(3), is constitutional and is a permissible legislative classification.

Appellant complains that farmworkers, and therefore members of racial minorities, are treated differently from other workers under Oregon law. The statute provides, in pertinent part, that workers receive two thirds weekly wages while disabled, with a stated maximum and minimum. Farmworkers are subject to this rule except that their weekly wage base is calculated by taking one fifty-second of the wages earned during the previous twelve months. The difference in treatment reflects the seasonal nature of farm work. In fact, a farmworker will receive the same benefits as any other worker earning the same annual wage.

It may well be that farmworkers generally get lower benefits than other workers because they earn less. But such economic discrimination in social welfare legislation is justified by a "reasonable basis" for the distinction. Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U.S. 471, 90 S.Ct. 1153, 25 L.Ed.2d 491 (1970). It is permissible for the Oregon legislature to scale workmen's compensation benefits to wages earned.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rios v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 16, 1973
477 F.2d 288 (9th Cir. 1973)

In Rios v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Company et al., 477 F.2d 288 the Ninth Circuit sustained the validity of the Oregon Workmen's Compensation law in respect to the computing of compensation of injured farmworkers, a class that represents a racial minority.

Summary of this case from Massey v. Thiokol Chemical Corp.
Case details for

Rios v. Oregon Automobile Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:GUSTAVO RIOS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 16, 1973

Citations

477 F.2d 288 (9th Cir. 1973)

Citing Cases

McCrae v. Wilson

The limitation on farm workers' claims which was imposed by subsection (3) has been held to be a…

Massey v. Thiokol Chemical Corp.

        Besides the present case, only two decisions appear to deal with racial impact of compensation laws.…