From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ringo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug 13, 2013
404 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. ED 98922.

2013-08-13

Earl RINGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Washington County, Kenneth W. Pratte, Judge. Kent Denzel, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of Washington County, Kenneth W. Pratte, Judge.
Kent Denzel, Columbia, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Evan J. Buchheim, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Movant, Earl Ringo (“Ringo”), appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Ringo v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Aug 13, 2013
404 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

Ringo v. State

Case Details

Full title:Earl RINGO, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Aug 13, 2013

Citations

404 S.W.3d 912 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013)