From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ringling BROS.-BARNUM Bailey v. Acme Circus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 27, 1961
13 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

April 27, 1961

Motion for a stay dismissed, the appeal having become moot by the resettlement of the order appealed from and the taking of a new appeal from the resettled order. Motion for a stay denied, with $10 costs.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Rabin, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Summaries of

Ringling BROS.-BARNUM Bailey v. Acme Circus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 27, 1961
13 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

Ringling BROS.-BARNUM Bailey v. Acme Circus

Case Details

Full title:RINGLING BROS.-BARNUM BAILEY COMBINED SHOWS, INC. v. ACME CIRCUS OPERATING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1961

Citations

13 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)