Rimpson v. Mule Creek State Prison Warden

Full title: GREGORY WAYNE RIMPSON, Petitioner, v. MULE CREEK STATE PRISON WARDEN…

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 1, 2015

2:15-cv-1898 KJM AC P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2015)

Opinion

GREGORY WAYNE RIMPSON, Petitioner, v. MULE CREEK STATE PRISON WARDEN, Respondent. No. 2:15-cv-1898 KJM AC P United States District Court, E.D. California. October 1, 2015

          ORDER

          ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has neither filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 nor paid the filing fee for this action. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Merced County Superior Court. Merced County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

         2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: