From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rilly v. Swiftsure Oil Transportation Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

May, 1925.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The situation disclosed by the record was brought about by the appellant's own acts, and it is not entirely clear that the application is made in good faith, and not for the purpose of delay or to avoid responsibility for the claim. It is not a question of inconvenience, where no injustice would result, and where costs would compensate, but one where a substantial right would be impaired, and where justice requires, in the exercise of a proper discretion, a denial of the motion. Kelly, P.J., Jaycox, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rilly v. Swiftsure Oil Transportation Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Rilly v. Swiftsure Oil Transportation Company

Case Details

Full title:PAUL RILLY, Respondent, v. SWIFTSURE OIL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1925

Citations

214 App. Div. 734 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)